Bard vs ChatGPT:who will win?

Bard vs ChatGPT: who will win?

The two AI chatbots have gained high popularity. ChatGPT has been more used due to its longer existence. Although newly launched, expectations from Google are high as well. ChatGPT is a completely functional model, while Bard is in experimental and developmental mode. Comparing the two on various aspects is an interesting action. So, let’s embark together, Bard vs ChatGPT

A chatbot is a computer program that simulates a conversation with human users. Chatbots are often used in customer service applications, where they can provide automated answers to frequently asked questions. Chatbots can also be used for marketing purposes, to generate leads, or to qualify prospects.

Chatbots are becoming increasingly sophisticated, and they are now able to hold natural conversations with humans. This is due to the development of large language models (LLMs), which are artificial intelligence (AI) models that are trained on massive datasets of text and code. LLMs can be used to generate text, translate languages, and answer questions in a way that is indistinguishable from a human.

As LLMs continue to develop, chatbots will become even more powerful and versatile. They will be able to handle more complex tasks, such as providing customer support for technical products or generating creative content. Chatbots will also become more personalized, and they will be able to learn about your individual preferences and needs.

ChatGPT is an AI chatbot launched by OpenAI. It is an open-source platform using Natural Language Processing or NLP to create human-mimicking conversations. It takes text-based input and provides the same format of output. It can advise, create creative, professional, lengthy, and other types of content, write codes, translate texts, and other actions. It is a type of Generative AI that is trained with reinforcement learning. It is open for feedback and provides information up to September 2021.

Bard is a conversational and experimental AI launched by Google in March 2023. It uses Google’s in-house created LaMDA or Language Model for Dialogue Applications. It takes text and voices as input to provide text-based output. It also serves multiple functionalities such as content creation, research, virtual assistant, translation, and writing codes. It specializes in creating creative content. It provides updated information while also suggesting related topics based on the query.

Large Language Models or LLM power ChatGPT and Bard. These AI models are designed to interpret human language. Thus, they understand text and voice prompts. They intake inputs to further process them, such as summarize, answer, or translate.

They require dataset-based training with millions or billions of parameters and data points. Parameters indicate the gained knowledge whose increase in number is directly proportional to the accuracy of information.

ChatGPT is powered by OpenAI’s Generative Pre-trained Transformer-3.5 or GPT-3.5, among the largest LLMs of OpenAI. It has around 175 billion parameters. LaMDA powers Bard. It is owned by Google, which has also advanced it to LaMDA 2. The upgraded and refined version has a parameter count of 540 billion.

If you’ve been keeping up with AI language models, you’re likely familiar with Google’s LaMDA and OpenAI’s GPT-3 engine.

LaMDA focuses on understanding the intent behind each word, making it a pro at grasping nuanced inquiries.

OpenAI, on the other hand, leans towards natural language orientation, generating more coherent and contextually relevant responses.

These differences in approach lead to variations in their outputs.

A simple question like “What’s the weather like?” may get similar answers, but ask something complex or abstract, and the differences start to show.

LaMDA can understand questions even when they’re not traditionally phrased, making it ideal for unpredictable or unstructured user inputs.

With LaMDA, you could say “Is there rain in my day?” and still get an accurate response about today’s forecast.

GPT-3 by OpenAI excels at maintaining coherence over long conversations because of its emphasis on natural language orientation.

So, if you’re discussing climate change effects one moment and renewable energy solutions the next, GPT-3 will smoothly transition with you.

Note: It’s not about one model being superior to the other; they shine differently depending on the use case.

Now let’s compare how both language models perform in specific applications.

ChatGPT:

  1. Input: Handles text.
  2. Price: The basic version is free, and ChatGPT Plus costs $20 per month.
  3. Sign-in: Accepts any email address.
  4. Company: Developed by OpenAI (Microsoft).
  5. Data source: Utilizes a varying dataset.
  6. Language model: Powered by GPT-3.4/GPT-4.
  7. Responses: Provides a single response.
  8. Launch date: Released on November 30, 2022.
  9. Update: Knowledge is limited to 2021.
  10. Best usage: Suitable for generating text responses across various topics.

Bard:

  1. Input: Supports both text and voice inputs.
  2. Price: Completely free.
  3. Sign-in: Requires a Google email address.
  4. Company: Developed by Google.
  5. Data source: Relies on ‘infinite.LaMDA’ and various datasets.
  6. Language model: Built on LaMDA technology.
  7. Responses: Allows access to multiple responses at ‘view drafts’.
  8. Launch date: Launched on March 21, 2023.
  9. Update: Features real-time updates.
  10. Best usage: Ideal for specific topic-based queries.

Aside from differences in data sources and language models, there are a couple of other key differences between Bard and ChatGPT:

  • Coding: ChatGPT has been used for a while to generate code, whereas Bard’s switch to PaLM 2 has significantly improved its capabilities in this area.
  • Conversational learning: ChatGPT can learn from the conversations it has with people and “hold context”, whereas Bard does this in a much more limited way at the moment.
  • Drafts: Bard will produce multiple responses to queries you pose to it, which you can access by pressing “View Drafts.” ChatGPT only produces a single answer to each query.
  • Real-time access to the internet: Bard will reference and access the internet in real-time, whereas ChatGPT does not.
  • Image-based responses: Bard has access to the internet so can source images, whereas ChatGPT cannot.
  • Capacity to read responses aloud: Bard has native tet-to-speech capabilities, whereas ChatGPT does not.

When it comes to Q&A, Google Bard and ChatGPT are both powerhouses in their own right.

Bard has its strengths, but the GPT-4 version of ChatGPT has taken things up a notch.

Its ability to delve deeper into topics is exciting. For instance, if you need financial planning advice, ChatGPT-4 can provide that for you.

ChatGPT’s natural-sounding text stands out as one of its most impressive features. It’s like talking to a specialist who can easily break down complicated ideas.

This makes it not just useful for businesses or professionals seeking AI assistance but also for everyday users who want information on various subjects without jargon overload.

In comparison, Bard sometimes falls short when producing texts that sound human-like. While it does well in certain areas such as summarizing news articles or books, there’s room for improvement in other areas.

A chatbot like ChatGPT or Bard can serve various purposes for a content marketer, such as brainstorming content ideas or writing marketing emails.

Chatbots like ChatGPT and Bard are great for writing short-form content like product descriptions, social media captions, email newsletters, and FAQs. If you’re running out of ideas for your blog, these chatbots can also help you generate new topics within your niche.

Unfortunately, chatbots are not that great for long-form content. ChatGPT tends to ignore word count, so even if you explicitly say you want a 2,000-word article, it will only come up with around 600 words.

If your editorial calendar includes informational articles, case studies, white papers, and definitive guides, then you need a specialized AI tool to accomplish these writing tasks. Read our review of the best AI writing tools.

Pros of ChatGPT

  • Speedy response times: ChatGPT is superior to previous generations of AI chatbots because of the speed of its responses, which makes it helps businesses become more efficient. ChatGPT Plus is faster than Google Bard.
  • Ability to generate human-like responses: ChatGPT can produce more natural-sounding text than previous generations of AI chatbots, largely due to the vast amount of data it has been trained on.
  • User-friendly: ChatGPT can perform a wide range of tasks, from translating to condensing paragraphs to producing song lyrics, and it can do so for a wide audience. Its simple interface and straightforward responses make it an easy tool for those without technical expertise.
  • Supports many programming languages: ChatGPT supports Python, JavaScript, Java, and a dozen other programming languages.
  • Supports 20+ languages: ChatGPT “can understand and generate text” in more than 20 languages.

Cons of ChatGPT

  • Limited accuracy and reliability: Chat GPT’s responses may contain errors since it is using training data. It is also not current; the latest update was in September 2021.
  • Hidden bias: ChatGPT may produce biased responses due to the dataset it is trained on. The source material itself may contain biases, which can affect the responses offered by ChatGPT. For instance, ChatGPT is not great at answering questions that are not in English and often produces errors.
  • No real-world understanding: ChatGPT is limited to the dataset it was trained on, and though it can produce impressive responses, it is based on what is available online, not what has been learned through real human experience.

Pros of Google Bard

  • High-quality text generation: Google Bard can produce human-like text that can be used for a range of tasks, from answering queries to summarizing material to translating text.
  • Large dataset: Google Bard is pre-trained on a massive dataset of text and code, which allows it to generate more comprehensive and informative responses than smaller models.
  • Creative text output: Google Bard can assist in creating a variety of text, from job descriptions to hiring letters to writing reports, which makes it a versatile tool for the enterprise.
  • Write code in many programming languages: Google claims that Bard can generate code for simple and complex tasks alike in several programming languages, even from prompts written in natural language.
  • Language support: Bard supports U.S. English, Japanese, and Korean and can translate other languages.

Cons of Google Bard

  • Computational resources: Large transformer models use a lot of computational resources

ChatGPT

ChatGPT’s basic version is free, with a limit of 100 questions per day. For $20 per month, ChatGPT Plus gives subscribers faster response times, access to new features, and access to GPT-4 (the free version is currently using GPT-3.5). Organizations without a contract with OpenAI can get on a waitlist for access to the ChatGPT API.

Google Bard

Google Bard is free, with an unlimited number of questions. Google’s products have often remained free since the company mostly profits off of advertising.

At this point, it’s hard to judge which chatbot is better as they are both in their early training days. ChatGPT is efficient at generating and summarizing text requests. Bard does a better job of answering questions with more relevant information. These chatbots are still being trained as users submit feedback, so there may be changes.

Pros of Bard:

  • User-friendly interface.
  • Better for research.
  • Can research current information such as recent events.
  • Summarize webpages.

Cons of Bard:

  • Does not track previous requests.
  • Can be prone to AI hallucinations and make-up information.
  • Doesn’t offer as many plug-ins and integrations.
  • Sources aren’t always reliable on the internet.

Pros of ChatGPT:

  • Better at writing.
  • Stores previous conversations.
  • Can share responses with others.
  • Offers various plug-ins and integrations with popular sites and apps such as Expedia, Instacart, and Zapier.

Cons of ChatGPT:

  • Need to copy and paste the article for a summary.
  • Responses may be long so difficult to scan.
  • Must be fact-checked to prevent hallucinations or wrong information.
  • The more advanced version is not free.
Don't forget to share this post!

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *